DICKSON Development Application: 201120491 Address: 4 ROSEVEAR PLACE Block: 14 Section: 72

Proposal: COMMUNITY FACILITY – ADDITION & ALTERATION – GOVERNMENT WORKSHOP. Proposed provision of accessible path & toilet to shed, construction of new store room by enclosing verandah & construction of awning over entry to shed. Period for representations closes: 19/09/2011 Click here to view the plans

AINSLIE Development Application: 201120541 Address: 35 COWPER STREET Block: 14 Section: 23

Proposal: SINGLE RESIDENTIAL – DEMOLITION – ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS. Proposed demolition of the existing carport and store and addition of a new detached garage to the rear of the block; Includes addition of 3 new bedrooms and living area to the rear of the existing dwelling. Period for representations closes: 16/09/2011 Click here to view the plans

Giralang shops redevelopment announcement and wider implications for local shops

On 17 August 2011 the ACT Planning Minister used his call-in powers to approve the contentious redevelopment of the Giralang local shopping centre. The spokeman for the 40 or so independent supermarket operators comprising the Independent Retailers Group has issued a veiled threat to take the decision to the Supreme Court (reported in The Canberra Times 29 August 2011). Criteria 33 in the current Territory Plan requires a development application to take regard of significant impacts on other commercially viable local centres.

BRADDON Development Application: 201019330 Address: 28 MORT STREET Block: 5 Section: 28

Proposal: Proposed amendment to DA approval- Amendment include 1.Roof canopy reduced in width from 3m to 2m. 2.Gas meters repositioned and access to booster/fire sprinkler room altered. 3.First floor commercial area floor level reduced by 120mm. 4.Existing street tree removed and replaced with new tree. Period for representations closes: 07/09/2011 Click here to view the plans

Civic, airport mooted as stations in fast-train plan

Canberra Airport and Civic have been short listed for the terminus of a high-speed rail network. The cost for an access corridor and station is estimated to be $3.4 million compared to $1.7 million at Canberra Airport. The airline proportion of Canberra-Sydney travel is currently only 8% and is estimated to drop to 4% if a high-speed rail link between the two centres was provided. So why is the Australian Rail Association recommending a airport terminus rather than a Civic terminus. Where is the triple bottom line take into account social and environment costs (tearing up Majura Valley)? This decision …